On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >>> CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint >> >> discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the CUT mailing. I >> wrote a summary of the discussion that will be published in Linux Weekly >> News before tomorrow. >> >> Hopefully this summary will then lead to a constructive discussion on the >> way forward. > > Hi, > > Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for > discussing CUT on -de...@. > Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
Personally I have the feeling that if we would choose for rolling as described in the article, that testing would actually get replaced by rolling and we do not care about extensive architecture support anymore. Not sure if we want to take that route. Personally I think we are already taking the necessary steps to have a nice compromise regarding architecture support as well as most removals. Certainly there are improvements possible, though I'd rather have them implemented in testing proper (even if we would rename testing ;-)). Regarding the snapshots, I think that unless they are not frequent (aka one about every 6 months) we'd better spend our energy on more frequent d-i releases and just promote the use of testing more. If the snapshots would not be frequent they could probably help the general release process, be a better service to many users and maybe even help to solve the problems we have with clamav and chromium related packages. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9b353c.8070...@debian.org