On Friday, March 18, 2011 10:10:49 am Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de> [110318 14:38]: > > And as long as it works I see no reason why a maintainer should not be > > allowed to put the non-free dep first in alternatives if there is a good > > reason. > > Debian makes some promises to users. Suprisingly getting non-free > software installed is definitely nothing a maintainer alone should > be able to decide.
Since they would have had to enable non-free, suprise would not be an appropriate reaction. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103181029.24107.deb...@kitterman.com
