* Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> [110318 15:30]: > Since they would have had to enable non-free, suprise would not be an > appropriate reaction.
Again, just because they had to enable non-free does not mean it should change the semantics of anything else. Non-free is not there for some hypothetical "non-free junkie" but for users who "require the use of works that do not conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines". If someone looks at a package with apt-cache show or at packages.debian.org and sees no non-free or contrib in that and they get non-free software installed by installing it with say apt-get they have every right to be suprised. Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110318211932.ga32...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de