Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 21:26 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > kFreeBSD is currently released as a "technology preview". With that, we > mean it works, but it isn't necessarily ready yet for prime usage. The > fact that there currently aren't many users yet isn't surprising in that > light. However, as the port matures, it's not unthinkable that there > will be many more users. > > Frankly, I'd be somewhat surprised if some time after the release of > wheezy (but still before wheezy+1), usage of Debian kFreeBSD did not > surpass that of the i386 port.
You must be joking. So far only a very small subset of packages have been actually checked as working on kfreebsd. People are not going to risk seeing a dysfunctional system just so that they have pf and ZFS, unless they really need it. > > You disagree with systemd service files being much simpler than sysv > > init scripts for many daemons? > > No, I disagree with your statement that life of many maintainers of > daemon packages is a complete nightmare currently. > > Perhaps some things would be a bit easier to do with systemd unit files; > but most initscripts are slightly-modified template initscripts from > dh-make anyway; it's not as if they require a lot of effort to maintain. It’s not such a lot of effort indeed, but the quality of the result is not impressive either. Our init scripts are overall inconsistent and buggy. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311151866.4372.249.camel@pi0307572
