* Uoti Urpala <uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi> [110721 19:19]:
> First, as I already explained in earlier mails, it's wrong to think of only 
> very
> visible features like a separate kernel as counting for excluding/including 
> the
> people affected. There are _hundreds_ of other possible features/fixes with
> corresponding groups of people as large as potential kFreeBSD users. It's
> impossible to support them all.

There are hundreds of groups as that. But if you exclude any of them,
noone is left.

> Second, you're ignoring the negative effects of the decision to support
> something. Saying "the project must support this" does not magically add

Again there is a difference between saying "the project must support
this" and saying "we are not forced to support this, so I do not care
about it".

> features that help someone without hurting anyone. To make a rational decision
> about kFreeBSD support I can consider the likelihood of needing kFreeBSD in 
> the
> future vs the likelihood of encountering some problem on Linux that would have
> been fixed had resources not been diverted to kFreeBSD support, or would never
> have appeared in the first place if not for compromises needed for the sake of
> kFreeBSD support. The latter probability is much higher.

That is your prime mistake here. Over-doing compatibility can have
negative effects, but not looking far enough always causes
short-sightedness leading towards fragile code that is only useable by
the people that wrote it.

> To put it in software development terms: you are advocating feature creep.

Not replacing things with other things supporting much less is feature
creep now?

What you are suggesting in software development terms is a new build
system that only works on the developer's box. While it might look a
little better in the short term, you lose a lot of help from other
people and also in the long run are stuck with something finally
sub-par.

        Bernhard R. Link


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110721181532.ga32...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de

Reply via email to