>>>>> Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> writes:
>>>>> On Oct 11, Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>> Le mardi 11 octobre 2011 à 16:32 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>>> I am still not 100% persuaded that this would be easy to do, but at
>>> least I think that it has more merit than the old "move all to
>>> /"...
>> We already discussed the idea of dropping support for a separate
>> /usr, and the outcome was a broad consensus for keeping things this
>> way.
> No, we discussed the idea of merging /usr in / (to which I was
> opposed myself as well). This is a different concept.
The only significant difference that I can see is that /etc
could be put on a filesystem distinct to the one holding the
binaries. An end which, on a second though, I cannot readily
suggest on how to achieve any other way.
Essentially, we leave / for /etc/ (and mount points) only, while
/usr/ still serves roughly the same purpose as before.
--
FSF associate member #7257
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86wrcb1jn1....@gray.siamics.net
