>>>>> Philipp Kern <tr...@philkern.de> writes: >>>>> On 2011-10-11, Ognyan Kulev <o...@tower.3.bg> wrote: >>>>> На 11.10.2011 17:32, Marco d'Itri написа:
[…] >> /usr/src -> /usr/share/src > Probably depends if you want to support compile outputs there. I > guess some people compile their kernels there. Which isn't a good practice, anyway. For the kernel, it was my preference to have a single source hierarchy, and a separate hierarchy for each build, under, e. g., /var/tmp/, or /home/. (I haven't build a kernel for a while, though.) With /usr mounted read-only, it's still a suitable place for sources, but hardly so for builds. >> /usr/local -> /local > Don't know what you want to say with that, apart from getting rid of > FHS. I did it this way, and I did it the other. I feel no difference. As for the shared /usr, having local/ under /usr allows for site-specific software to be seen by the NFS clients, which is probably what one would want. -- FSF associate member #7257 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8639ey1uzq....@gray.siamics.net