On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 03/05/2012 03:40 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > But before getting there, the question is whether the existence of the > > website (and its popularity) poses problem to Debian reputation and/or > > to the activity of official Debian multimedia packaging. I think this is > > a question for the Debian Multimedia Maintainers (as in > > <[email protected]>) to answer. If they > > see a problem with debian-multimedia.org, we should get in touch with > > the website maintainers and solve the issue. > I do think this website hurts Debian, and its user community. > Let me explain, it's based on my past *user* experience.
I don't agree with you here. For me d-m.o was (and still is) valuable resource. Some codecs missing in Debian packages because of the policy (I don't blame Debian for that) and in that case d-m.o is best option for me because I don't want/have time to package it from the source. [...] -- Kind regards, Milan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
