Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:30:38AM -0700, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> writes:
>> > Its for after wheezy, definitely.
>> > Also, there are some open issues to be solved for this to happen.
>> > The most important is being able to deal with arch all packages. And
>> > worse - arch all packages able to build only on certain architectures.
>> > But thats outside dak and my area. Goto the buildd/wanna-build people to
>> > help for that.
>>
>> Also remeber, there are packages like cmucl that can only be built by
>> the same upstream release of itself and can currently survive in Debian
>> because the maintainer can upload a bootstrapped binary package along
>> the source
>
> So, you currently upload every arch with the sourceful upload? Or do you
> upload, wait for the buildd build-dep lock, and do a binary-only upload?
Guess why this package is Arch: i386 only ;-)
I'm not uploading at all just being in the same packaging team.
> I don't think anyone wants to get rid of binary-only uploads.
I read Joerg's Mail as dropping all *.deb that aren't signed by a
buildd.
Regards
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wqyog8ns....@mitoraj.siccegge.de
