On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:56AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Its for after wheezy, definitely. > Also, there are some open issues to be solved for this to happen. > The most important is being able to deal with arch all packages. And > worse - arch all packages able to build only on certain architectures. > But thats outside dak and my area. Goto the buildd/wanna-build people to > help for that.
It's not exactly outside of dak. I think we should sketch out what's needed post-wheezy. (I.e. it would help us if the uploads accepted would be machine readable so that we can figure out what exactly, mainly architecture-wise, entered the archive and when. Given that we won't have fully architecture independent builds we'd also need to deal with rejects because the arch:all entered the archive through another upload. I have a set of notes on that at home.) > Adjusting dak then to throw away stuff and only allow buildd keys to > have .debs pass through isn't all that hard. I don't think that will happen or we'll have a GR about it. (The throw-away of binary-only uploads, that is.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature