On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Unless we're having some heavyweight process with multiple pings >> etc. (which we IMO shouldn't) the way the maintainer might first >> discover that someone feels the package needs to be orphaned is by the >> ITO bug. The maintainer needs to have a good chance to object. > > Why should a maintainer who ignored several other bugs should be > astonished about such kind of a bug? > > OK, if you want a chance for objection: Lets add to the procedure an > upload to DELAYED/15 which gives another two weeks time to react. I > definitely think that somebody who really is in the mood of salvaging > a package and has some momentum should not be delayed a longer time > than two weeks to start with some action.
That is essentially my proposal then. Maybe we need a DELAYED/30 (or more) queue for orphaning uploads? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpoo1xvbfzymliwfpqems_j5so0wrg0lkubirf253h...@mail.gmail.com