On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:04:38 +0200, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: >since some people might not read planet debian, here is a link to my >first blog post in a series of posts dealing with the results of the >Debian systemd survey: > >http://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2013/06/09/systemd-bloat.html
Thanks for a remarkably unbiased view on the matter. I have to object against one part though: |While it is sad that those machines cannot profit from systemd, switching |to systemd as a default has no downside either: Debian continues to |support sysvinit for quite some time, so these machines will continue |to work even with upcoming Debian versions. I doubt this will happen. Once systemd is the default on Deban/GNU Linux, people will stop testing their init scripts, or they will even stop shipping init scripts, leaving the task of writing or testing init scripts to the non-Linux porters, which will of course decrease their quality since init scripts should be written and tested by people knowing the initted software very intimately. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1umfnj-0003ia...@swivel.zugschlus.de
