On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 10/25/2013 11:02 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>> Supporting two different init systems is something I don't think >>> *anyone* wants to get into. Remember they use different files, so this >> >> Erm, we already support sysv-rc, file-rc, systemd, upstart… >> so my favourite GR outcome would just say that Debian fully >> commits to continue doing that. > > Plus if we choose Upstart or Systemd, then that's effectively what we > are going to do (I mean, we'd have to support 2 init systems, because of > Hurd & kFreeBSD).
popcon.debian.org has some data about the usage of said architectures/kernels: amd64: 92600 i386: 63099 hurd-i386: 25 kfreebsd-amd64: 68 kfreebsd-i386: 53 Holding up development of our Linux architecture for the 0.1% isn't serving the majority of Debian's users well. I know popcon isn't perfect, but its margin of error is acceptable for talking about the gross disparity in number of users between Linux and Hurd/kFreeBSD. -mz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOLfK3V_E=+l6fy6k7qseze6n_faacwskse1q1lct8_hxc2...@mail.gmail.com
