Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:14:18PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Isnât that a reason to rather remove it, under the hostile upstream >> clause (cf. J�rg Schilling), or at the very least, not base anything >> important on it? > >Hostile upstream != GPL / CDDL incompatabilities.
I don't know how aware you are of the history with Schily; a hostile upstream with a willfully strange interpretation of how GPL works is worse than just GPL / CDDL incompatibilities. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vzpoe-0000j6...@mail.einval.com
