Cameron Norman <camerontnor...@gmail.com> writes: > I believe the choices are to repose the question to the TC, now that the > situation has actually occurred, or begin a General Resolution. As far as > I understand, a GR would only need a majority since the TC did not really > make a ruling.
The release team can decide on testing migration schedules and on release-critical bugs following their normal processes. That was part of the point of the TC not ruling: the project should follow its normal processes and do its normal good job of balancing the conflicts between getting the right software into the next release and keeping the release stable. The timing of migration of the new version of systemd to testing, like questions about testing migration in general, is really a release team decision. They may want the new systemd to get into testing for broader testing ASAP, or they may want to use this as an opportunity to test the upgrade process that we expect stable users to go through (in which case waiting for systemd-shim may make sense), or they may have some other opinion or goal. Regardless, it's up to them; this is their bailiwick, obviously with the opinions of the maintainers of the relevant packages taken into account. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87d2cq4mv7....@windlord.stanford.edu