Ian Jackson, on Wed 10 Aug 2016 13:45:05 +0100, wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt writes ("Re: use long keyid-format in gpg.conf (Re: Key
> collisions in the wild"):
> > [explanation]
>
> Thanks.
>
> I don't know what side of this (one) line such a proposed gpg change
> falls. I still think it's unsatisfactory that our stable release has
> a default behaviour which cannot be used safely.Well, I'd argue that 64bit IDs are not safe either, they have not been made to be. Samuel
