thanks for having this discussion!

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-11-14 17:33:55)
> > Can I ask you the converse question: what same-timestamp proposal do
> > you think is best and why ?
> I found Guillem's suggestion the most sensible and as far as I understand the
> matter also the easiest to implement:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (2016-11-09 00:18:25)
> > So the actual problem is that the last timestamp gets reused for the
> > binNMUs, which seems totally bogus to me. This needs to be fixed in
> > whatever is injecting the binNMU entries on the buildds.
> but that proposal did not get any attention…

I'm not sure what his actual proposal was.

To me it seems a binNMU should change SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, as
debian/changelog gets modified by changelog.$arch, so it's actually a
different source which is being build.

What do you think?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to