debian-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Holger Levsen
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Bálint Réczey
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Colin Watson
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Roberto C . Sánchez
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Otto Kekäläinen
  • git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Richard Lewis
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Holger Levsen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Bálint Réczey
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon Josefsson
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrius Merkys
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Jonathan McDowell
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Peter B
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Ananthu C V
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Charles Plessy
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference) Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Simon McVittie
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Marco d'Itri
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Marc Haber
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Santiago Vila
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) thomas
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Sean Whitton
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools gregor herrmann
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference gregor herrmann
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Bálint Réczey
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?) Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? debian-devel
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? thomas
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? Wookey
  • Re: ITN procedure? Andreas Tille
  • Re: ITN procedure - more words, fewer acronyms please? Simon McVittie
  • Re: ITN procedure - more words, fewer acronyms please? Wookey
  • Re: ITN procedure? thomas
  • Re: ITN procedure? Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: ITN procedure? thomas
  • Re: ITN procedure? gregor herrmann
• FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Julien Plissonneau Duquène
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Richter
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Ahmad Khalifa
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Santiago Vila
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Santiago Vila
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon McVittie
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Marco d'Itri
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Vincent Lefevre
  • /usr/games usage (Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH?) Holger Levsen
  • Re: /usr/games usage (Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH?) Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? The Wanderer
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Michael Biebl
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon McVittie
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon McVittie
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Santiago Vila
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Santiago Vila
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Michael Biebl
  • Re: FTBFS when /bin is before /usr/bin in PATH? Vincent Lefevre
• Re: Bug#1104643: Don't consider tests during build that can use internet if available as rc buggy Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Bug#1104643: Don't consider tests during build that can use internet if available as rc buggy Bill Allombert
  • Re: Bug#1104643: Don't consider tests during build that can use internet if available as rc buggy Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Bug#1104643: Don't consider tests during build that can use internet if available as rc buggy Santiago Ruano Rincón
• Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Santiago Vila
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle Henrik Ahlgren
• Bug#1104676: ITP: python-friendly-styles -- Pygments styles designed for friendly/friendly-traceback Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
• Bug#1008532: ITP: fcitx5-mcbopomofo -- McBopomofo input method for fcitx5 李健秋
• Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Ben Hutchings
  • Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Bill Allombert
  • Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Ben Hutchings
  • Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Simon McVittie
  • Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Helmut Grohne
  • Re: Adding Pre-Depends from linux-image packages to linux-base Ben Hutchings
• Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Julien Puydt
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Steven Robbins
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Mo Zhou
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Mo Zhou
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Jeremy Bícha
  • discussion extension (was: Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models M. Zhou
  • Re: discussion extension (was: Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Andreas Tille
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Ansgar 🙀
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Stefano Rivera
  • Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Ansgar 🙀
• Bug#1104557: ITP: fonts-libertinus -- High-quality open-source typefaces for academic and scientific use Abhishek Deshpande
• Ray wrestlingang186
• Bug#1104523: ITP: libcrac-java -- Java library providing a wrapper for OpenJDK CRaC API Miguel Landaeta
• Bug#1104502: ITP: rustowl -- Visualize Ownership and Lifetimes in Rust MuntasirSZN
• Bug#1104476: ITP: torrent-file-editor -- Qt-based GUI tool to create and edit .torrent files Facundo Acevedo
• u​nsubscribe Chris Martinelli
• howto customize apache service from another package PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: howto customize apache service from another package Yadd
  • Re: howto customize apache service from another package PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: howto customize apache service from another package Marco d'Itri
  • Re: howto customize apache service from another package PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
• Bug#1104310: ITP: golang-github-a-h-htmlformat -- Tool used to format HTML Taavi Väänänen
• Bug#1104309: ITP: golang-github-a-h-parse -- Set of parsing tools for Go Taavi Väänänen
• why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Sven Joachim
  • Re: why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Jonathan Dowland
  • Re: why is Perl Build-Essential: yes? Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
• Bug#1104297: ITP: python-pyslurm -- Python Interface to Slurm Michael Fladischer
• Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Matthew Vernon
  • Re: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Aigars Mahinovs
  • Re: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models Gunnar Wolf
• Need advice on raku-* package mess Dominique Dumont
  • Re: Need advice on raku-* package mess Paul Gevers
  • Re: Need advice on raku-* package mess Dominique Dumont
  • Re: Need advice on architecture exclusion when arch: all packages are involved. Charles Plessy
  • Re: Need advice on architecture exclusion when arch: all packages are involved. Simon McVittie
• Bug#1104228: ITP: esstra -- software suite for Enhancing Software Supply Chain Transparency Hideki Yamane
• Bug#1104179: ITP: fretboard -- Guitar chord lookup app for GNOME Jeremy Bícha
• Re: Bug#1104169: wish: adduser _radvd on new installs Geert Stappers
  • Re: Bug#1104169: wish: adduser _radvd on new installs Bastian Blank
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? (was: Bug#1104169: wish: adduser _radvd on new installs) Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Geert Stappers
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Sune Vuorela
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Bastian Blank
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Marc Haber
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Jakub Wilk
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Matthias Urlichs
  • Re: Is it worth spending more time on adduser? Marc Haber

• Earlier messages
• Later messages