I think that every published versions must have an entry in d/changelog

If unstable version follows some experimental ones, then I prefer to have the 
full entries.

This can also help to debug when an other package has a ">= exp-version"

Le 3 décembre 2019 08:21:12 GMT+01:00, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> a écrit :
>Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> writes:
>> What is the best approach for d/changelog when releasing a package to
>> unstable after it has been through a few iterations to experimental ?
>> It would seem that the right thing to do is to keep all experimental
>> changelog entries, and add a new one for unstable.
>This is the typical practice, including all the intermediate
>or false starts in experimental.
>I sympathize with wanting to clean up some of that, but as a project we
>generally have decided to live with that.  Most users don't read the
>changelog anyway (user-visible notes should be in NEWS instead, which
>shown to more people via apt-listchanges), and removing versions from
>history has bad effects on the bug-tracking system, historical
>Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)             

Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma 

Reply via email to