On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 13:57:50 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> The upstream name is "muon", but this package and /usr/bin/ name is already
> used by KDE Muon, a [dead] synaptic alternative.
>
> I'm not sure how to handle this conflict; naming the Debian package "muon-
> meson" or "muon-build" seems fine, but renaming the "muon" binary might be
> less
> desirable.
muon-build seems more consistent with its own domain name muon.build, the
reference meson implementation's domain name mesonbuild.com, and their
shared dependency ninja being packaged as ninja-build.
smcv
