On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 15:48, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 13:57:50 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > > The upstream name is "muon", but this package and /usr/bin/ name is already > > used by KDE Muon, a [dead] synaptic alternative. > > > > I'm not sure how to handle this conflict; naming the Debian package "muon- > > meson" or "muon-build" seems fine, but renaming the "muon" binary might be > > less > > desirable. > > muon-build seems more consistent with its own domain name muon.build, the > reference meson implementation's domain name mesonbuild.com, and their > shared dependency ninja being packaged as ninja-build.
And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and using the same path should be ok as well? Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
