Hi,

* [email protected] <[email protected]> [2026-05-17 08:52]:
but then chooses
to additionally fabricate a fact about the file debian/copyright for a
more polished result.

Yes, that is a dirty workaround. I am glad this discussion came up. And I hope we find a better solution I can my tool adapt to. I am not happy about the current behavior of my tool. It is also quit young.

FWIW, the REUSE FAQ recommends this as official workaround:
https://reuse.software/faq/#uncopyrightable


Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to