Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > However, that experience also reinforced my impression that we currently > lack a generally accepted process for dealing with packages that appear > to have no active maintenance but are not formally orphaned.
sorry if this is a stupid question: instead of a new process, why not propose changing the existing MIA process to forceably orphan such packages? then the interested poeple (which can include the inactive maintainer/uploader) can adopt it?
