Am 1. Juli 2026 11:41:24 UTC schrieb Andreas Tille <[email protected]>:
>I did provide two concrete examples where the existing workflows did not >appear to lead to a satisfactory maintenance status: > > 1. clucene-core > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/06/msg00038.html <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/06/msg00087.html> Tl;dr: the existing workflow wasn't triggered. after it was triggered by you, Andreas, on june 10th, this lead to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1139752 and <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1139802> one June 12. so the process worked extremely well in this case. Andreas, you knew that, so why are you still claiming that for clucene-core it didn't work? > > 2. libasyncns > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/06/msg00131.html I've received your mail to [email protected] today 13:59 about them; we will take a look. tobi hi
