Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > I understand and at least partially agree with the argument that it > would have been better if that alternative were also copyleft, but the > authors didn't choose that licensing scheme and wrote some solid free > software that people prefer over GnuPG.
Argh, I *also* didn't read to the bottom of Guillem's message and made the incorrect assumption that Sequoia was non-copyleft because that is typical in the Rust community. Apologies for this nonsense. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
