On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 08:01:49PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> writes: > > >> I'm not denying people have other arguments too, including your > >> technical/social arguments. > > > > ...and you did get to the bottom of Guillem's e-mail, right? :) > > > >> [Guillem Jover <[email protected]> writes:] > >> > (BTW and AFAIR most of Sequoia components are either LGPL or GPL.) > > > > sq's debian/copyright file says LGPL-2+ and GPL-2+. And yes, that is > > also true of many of the Rust crates it depends on. > > Seqoia PGP is LGPLv2+ after requests, I believe from RedHat and maybe > others, but I don't know the full story. It first used GPLv3+ and then > GPLv2+ and then LGPLv2+: > > https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia/-/blob/main/LICENSE.txt > > https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia/-/commits/main/LICENSE.txt
...so all strong-copyleft licenses, from the start. > Where did you read that sq's debian/copyright says GPL-2+? Compare: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/rust-sequoia-sq/1.3.1-11/debian/copyright Yeah, sorry, I should have read more carefully, only the Debian packaging uses GPL-2+, not the upstream source, but I believe that is sort of irrelevant to the discussion here. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
