Hi, On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 06:02:48AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/25/26 22:04, Manu wrote: > > > It might work when you have a really good harness, lots of tooling, tests. > > quality gates and no escape. > > Yes, the expectation is that more testing harnesses will be built as a > result. After all, the existing DDs still largely know what they are doing. > > One thing I am missing from the proposal to allow AI contributions is how > the NM process would work. Do we allow applicants to use AI?
We don't currently explicitly mention the use of LLM for the process itself, but we have recently added the following to make it clear that we want applicants to own their answers: "...keep in mind that I would like to have a conversation with you: if you quote content not directly written by you, please make sure it is correctly attributed, and that the sources are mentioned." If any red flags arise, the AM will try to have an honest conversation with the applicant about it, and of course this may negatively affect their application. Admittedly, we don't have a documented policy on it, but the above is my understanding based on experience and also from our BoF discussion during DC25. Bests, -- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
