hello Am 12.09.26 um 15:18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 09.09.26 um 20:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:Am 09.09.26 um 16:10 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:hello, please add all authors with their files to d/copyright.Fwiw, I don't plan to do that.There are many packages which don't do that either, say src:linux because this is not maintainable.I will use "Rainer Gerhards (Adiscon GmbH) and others".Please be more specific which files are under which licenses. The files in test/ are not dual-licensed as you mentioned in d/copyright You find more information underRegarding that: I understand the DEP-5 syntax [1] like this: If code contains both license A and B parts it should use "and". If code is dual-licensed it should use "or".
In section 7.2 [1] you find this statement: " This is for a file that has both GPL and classic BSD code in it: License: GPL-2+ and BSD-3-clause this is explizit for different licensed parts in one file. Only the code marked explizit as under BSD-3 can be used so. If you use the whole file in another Project you have to follow the GPL-2+.
In my case, I used "and", i.e. "GPL-3.0+ and Apache-2.0". Parts of the code uses Apache-2.0 (Mostly newer code), older code uses (GPL-3.0+)So the summary: Files: * Copyright: GPL-3.0+ and Apache-2.0 seems correct to me. Please advice. Michael[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ #license-specification
Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
