Yes, but let me tell you something: I use Claude Code for my development too. Its standard tooling, BUT i do use standard licences, and i disclose clearly that i used AI tooling. Still, that is just an assumption by the United States of America, I live in the EU (specifically Romania), so its still unknown if there is a ruling about whether AI tooling can be copyrighted or not. Its still not global consensus yet, so your info might be inaccurate.
Sincerely, Ştefan Andrei Ionuţ În mar., 20 oct. 2026 la 10:04, Stephan Verbücheln <[email protected]> a scris: > There are also questions regarding the license, since the project > appears to have a significant number of code generated by an LLM > (Claude). > > * Since LLM-generated output is not copyrightable, can you even > legally dictate what license the browser has? Can we rely on the > assertion that it is GPLv3-licensed? > * Can you rule out that copyrighted code sections from the training > data are in the browser's code base without the author's permission > or without correct attribution as required by many software > licenses? > > Please not that many non-copyleft licenses also require correct author > attribution. > > Regards > Stephan > >
