On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 12:56:42PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 03 Jun 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 May 1998, Jay Wardle wrote:
> >
> > > [...Raul wrote...]
> > > > If this can't be fixed easily, perhaps we ought to promote lprng to
> > > > standard and demote lpr to optional. Yes, I know that bug-for-bug
> > > > compatability is a nice thing, but in my experience lprng is superior to
> > > > lpr.
>
> If you take a look at the bug report, you'll see that there's a
> workaround already in place for this bug, but the maintainer left the
> bug report intact because he wants to find a cleaner solution.
>
> Hence this discussion of lpr <-> lprng is pretty much off-topic, and
> distracting to the point in question.
>
> He probably should have changed the priority to wishlist, however.
I did change the severity to wishlist.
Adam Klein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
