On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >If there are optional packages that conflict with each other, we should
>> >choose one to stay in optional and move the others to extra. (Or change/
>> >clarify the definition on the policy manual).
>>
>> The manual should be fixed IMHO - there are lots of places where this is
>> bogus. Consider the xserver packages, for example...
>
>This is not a good example.
>The xserver packages do not conflict at each other.
>You can install all of them.
Hmmm, guess so. My mistake. But surely there are some optional packages
that can legitimately conflict...? And I'm still not convinced this is a
major issue...
--
Steve McIntyre, Allstor Software [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh My God! They Killed init! You Bastards!
"Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
"Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I..."
