On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 01:24:13AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote: > > On 25-Jan-99 Chris Lawrence wrote: > > IMHO we should also be discussing how the vote on this proposal will > > be structured. My understanding is that there are multiple DFSG > > revision proposals "out there", even though this one is the only one > > being currently hashed out on the list. > > > > My voting structure proposal is (using preference voting): > > > > [ ] Retain current DFSG > > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by A and B > > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by C > > ... > > [ ] None of the above alternatives is acceptable > > > > I envision it as being: > > [ ] ORIGINAL Draft > [ ] Draft w/o patch clause > [ ] Draft w/o advertising clause > [ ] Draft w/o both clauses > [ ] Current DFSG > [ ] FURTHER Discussion (required by constitution)
Please include URLs, there are SO MANY different proposals we really should give people pointers to exactly which they're voting on. -- "I'm working in the dark here." "Yeah well rumor has it you do your best work in the dark." -- Earth: Final Conflict