> In my more than honest opinion, I think util-linux 2.9g should be included > in slink. Developments in the computer business are going fast, as everyone > knows, and on the day slink will get released, I think a lot of people who > are going to upgrade to slink, also want to have the newest kernel, 2.2. > That's why slink should be compatible with Linux-2.2, otherwise it is quite > a bit outdated at the moment of release. There is a major difference between > not being compatible with the latest major kernel release, and not including > the latest patchlevel of some software thingie.
A "stable" release is always out of date. If you want leading edge, use "unstable". We release "stable" so people have a known set that works together. It isn't an attempt to package the end-all and be-all of current Linux stuff. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All is fair in love and war.