Am 06.07.98 schrieb Marcus.Brinkmann # ruhr-uni-bochum.de ... Moin Marcus!
MB> So, a nice frontend could display the DDH or, alternatively, the Types:. I don#t understand whatfor we need types. I think we should remove this tag. MB> > !! Duh! That's a good point! I guess you're right that there's no MB> > point on translating the title of an english document into German, is MB> > there? MB> I think it is a very good idea to translate the title of a document. No, it#s a bad idea. Why should we should the user a German title if the document is in English? If he don#t understand English, he can#t read the document, so why do we need a German title? MB> > If I recall, you would prefer to have docreg files in the MB> > documentation area, i.e., /usr/doc/<pkg>. I am amenable to this, MB> > actually, but if you're going to be reading docreg files directly, I MB> > think this is going to be evil. MB> The docreg file isn't documentation, So what? I don#t understand that. There#re a lot of files in /usr/doc that#re not documentation. And the user won#t see the files. For example apache includes its .htaccess files in the html directories. MB> therefore it has nothing to do in /usr/doc. ??? Ok, please delete all metadata informations (RDF, <link> tag) from the HTML files in /usr/doc. And please don#t forget do delete all images. MB> They shouldn't appear there, and I *hate* dot files elsewhere MB> than in my home directory, where I don't know about them. Could you explain the reason? dot files are a standard for local configuration files (see for example apache). MB> (d) It would be a dot file then, and I hate dot files. Nice argument :). MB> (e) It is not documentation. Not true. cu, Marco -- Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/5202.15 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
