In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Leutloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that one big point was missed in the last discussion about
> DocBook:

Actually, I think these points were raised very clearly. How do you
deal with the other points?

Some argue that *requiring* the docbook DTD for *all* debian
documentation would raise the curve for new documenters.  I agree.

I argue that the whole idea that DebianDoc documentation has to be
DTD-specific at all can be overcome with the judicious use of Formal
Architectures.  I.e., one could use either Docbook or Debiandoc-98
DTDs as they choose.

--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply via email to