On 29 Nov 1998, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Figures, tables, indexes, oh my! > > Why aren't people considering the redefinition of debiandoc as a > meta-DTD, as a formal architecture. Then you can use debiandoc-sgml > and we can improve it incrementally or whatever, and we could also > have docbook that has all these features already? >
If DocBook meets all our needs, why bother with the meta-DTD business? Just use DocBook. If DocBook doesn't, then we still have to improve DebianDoc even if we do have the meta-DTD. So either way there's no point in having a meta-DTD. No? :-) Havoc
