>>>>> "Ardo" == Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ardo> One only needs to look out for name clashes between the various Ardo> chapters of both documents, but that's just a matter of using a Ardo> unique prefix in each document in the 'id=""'s of the chapters. Ardo> Then there's only the problem with the footnote.html files which Ardo> currently are named as such. I think this all calls for a Ardo> 'prefix' PI indicating the prefix to be used for the names of Ardo> the various .html files. This also has the advantage of not Ardo> having to put this prefix in all the 'id=""'s of the chapters.
Wait, if we have basename, why would we need prefix? So if basename is 'dir/foo', and my chapter id is 'bar', and my extension is 'html', the URL for the output would be 'dir/foo-bar.html', right? Footnotes could be in 'dir/foo-footnotes.html' -- why not? If the basename is just 'dir/' (trailing slash needed!) and the other stuff is the same, the output would be 'dir/bar.html' and 'dir/footnotes.html'. Sound good? The intention here is that *fewer* variable are better. You've flattenned Norm Walsh's three variables (dir, basename, top-filename, and, uh, even %use-id-in-filename) to two variables, which is better. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
