On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:08:16PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:15:20AM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Please update me your opinion on this matter. My current understandings > > are: > > Option1(this / that) Option2(this/ that) Option3(this/that) > > Osamu Yes OK prefer to avoid > > Josip Better over Opt2 prefer to avoid No comment > > Denis No(Strong) No comment Yes(Strong) > > Chris Yes?(implied) No comment No comment > > I choose ... <pensive> door 1! > > Yeah, I've always preferred that format anyway, I think it's easier > to read and more consistent. > > However, isn't the particular case you're talking about actually a > case of program syntax? I mean, you shouldn't break the syntax if > that's what it is.
This is not any part of short-form SGML syntax nor and part of example script. Just a part of plain text contents. Since SGML parsers treats "/" as non-whitespace characters, it treats "/" as a part of long word and does not break line. ---x8 snip-start <sect id="depends">What is meant by saying that a package Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Conflicts/Replaces/Provides another package? ---x8 snip-end Real question is what is the correct or recommended practice for this type of situation? Someone with access to some authoritative English style guide books for technical writing maybe the one to judge. It ain't me. Chris, hint, hint, ...(You seem to be the only native English speaker on this thread) -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D
