On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:06:35AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:58:32PM -0700, ben wrote: > > > <sect id="depends">What is meant by saying that a package > > > <tt>Depends</tt>, <tt>Recommends</tt>, <tt>Suggests</tt>, > > > <tt>Conflicts</tt>, <tt>Replaces</tt>, <tt>Provides </tt> another > > > package? > > > > however you arrange the formatting, you really do need to write 'Depends > > on,' > > and 'Conflicts with,' > > > > otherwise, stylistically, it's just going to look plain ugly and be > > grammatically incorrect. > > It's in italics (<em>) so I guess it'll be obvious that it's a bunch of > literal strings?
I changed <tt> --> <em> to match following section before submitting patch to Josip. I concur with Josip on this point.. Adding "with" ... screw-up whole FAQ context. I think it should be read in the context. (I may have made wrong impression if someone read my post only) Thanks all. -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D
