Osamu Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi > Are you closing them completely or giving "wontfix". > > I think it deserves "wontfix" :-) so you will not get bugged.
I prefer to close them completely. They are definitely not high runners for any future version. And they will always be available as archived. > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:45:58PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While going through the list of outstanding issues for debiandoc-sgml > > I started to wonder whether these all are still applicable. Below is > > the list of outstanding issues and my proposal for each of them. [snip] > > 8. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141727 > > <table> tag and how it can be implemented > > > > Proposal = implement > > It will be nice :-) Please make sure conversion to docbook-xml is easy. > #1 priority in terms of usefulness. But a bit complicated. Well, I will first do the indices and enum stuff (those are easier :-). > If you do this, I can stay in debiandoc-sgml longer. :-) > > Then there are also some outstanding issues for debiandoc-sgml-doc: [snip] > > 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=43718 > > > > Proposal = implement > > Please. I think we need some guidance in how to build CJK things for > PS/PDF, if you can. I am asamed to admit that I do not know it. Well, that makes then two of us. But I'll look into this. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
