On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:25:56AM +0100, Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a > wrote: > > Ok, here's my proposal on how should DDP be restored: > > I basically agree your proposal for module "debian-doc/ddp". > > For module "debian-doc/manpages", let them move to alioth now unless > these are published on debian web page. (Clarification?) This should > make everyone happy. > > As for your concern for the build script, maybe running them under chroot > environment (a la pbuilder) may reduce risks. Just my 2 cents. > > As for translator, I think that my previously posted review may help > reduce their tasks. So please refer to it when you post to other list. >
Just my two cents for publishing: a. Remove all makefiles from the (future) alioth DDP repository. b. Remove all data/sgml files from current old-gluck repository. A script on gluck can automatically (over-)write all makefiles within a checkout copy of the alioth repository, and publish soon after. That's all. Little variants of this approach could be considered (e.g.data files for selecting languages, etc.) -- Francesco P. Lovergine
