On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:40:27PM +0000, James Troup wrote: > Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Following the instructions post-compromise, and even if a bit late, the > > DDP CVS has been checked by different members of the project [1]. > > Does the debian-doc repository have to remain group Debian? We're > trying to tie down CVS to unprivileged users and groups. If at all > possible, I'd like to restrict this to a group of committers rather > than have it open to all 900+ developers. However, if that's what you > really want...
Attached is a list of the DD that have contributed to the DDP CVS at some point. Please create a debian-doc group with these and restrict the CVS with it. Not all of them are active but we can do the filtering later on, as soon as the CVS is reinstated we will make an announcement with the current status and how/when the project will be moved to Alioth. > > > [DDP @ alioth.] > > FWIW (and since JFS asked me to comment), I'd prefer the solution > where only data is alioth, and scripts are either updated by hand or > (if you must) updated from gluck. Noted. For the time being we are going to move data from gluck to Alioth and keep the scripts in gluck's CVS. I understand that the cron job at klecker will be updating it's contents from gluck's CVS. Correct? Is there a way for us to supervise that cronjob? Thanks Javi
anfra aph barbier bdale blade bortz clebars elphick foka frankie hertzog hp jfs joey joy kov kubota lowe mdz mhatta mrj murat netzwurm nico nidd oohara opal osamu porridge rkrusty sano tale vince weasel willy
