On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:28:31AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > I've not mentioned lilo, as I could not see how that is related. > > <maks> 08:41:07 fjp: because lilo only passes the major and minor nr of > the root device, so we mknod it and can't waitloop for it to appear > > We could add this info for 4.0r1.
If there is no time required to analyze this problem but it is still considered important enough to get documented I wonder why it isn't added now? The current authors (including you!) did a lot of useful and good changes the last days but another minor change is impossible? Of course I know that it was anounced that the Relase Notes stabilized and it is save to translate it without expecting major updates and rewrites but this is no reason to delay information you consider important! It's again this stupid "no fully translation ==> no publication" which avoids to inform the user about facts, right? It would be the first DDP document which incapacitates the user by deciding whether the reader is forced to read the up to date English document or a (maybe only slightly) outdated translation. Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
