Hi Javier, Holger Wansing <[email protected]> wrote: > > What do you think? > > There is a bugreport, filed by myself :-) > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788361 > with a patch. > > It contains many typo fixes, missing or unnecessary commas/dots etc. > These changings should be indisputable, nothing to discuss about, so > I think they should get committed. (The above bugreport also contains > some other changings, which might be worth to discuss about, but I would > leave such changings out for this first step.) > I could provide a patch, which contains only that indisputable fixes, > where the fixes do not affect the translations. So I would also unfuzzy > the po files, to not bother the respective translators with that > (all active translations are po-based; there is only zh_CN which is > sgml-based, but that's heavily outdated already, so no need to care about > that). > Po-based translations are in a very good shape, nearly all are 100% > translated, > so unfuzzying is easy. > > > What do you think? > Any objections for this? > Should I prepare the above mentioned patch?
I have prepared this patch some days ago, and now I saw it is corrupted due to this commit: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq/basic_defs.sgml?r1=10448&r2=11070 So I will prepare a patch once more, will provide it here, and then commit it 2 days later, if noone objects. I hope you don't mind Holger -- Holger Wansing <[email protected]>
