Hi, Am Sa. Juni 4 22:09:03 2016 GMT+0200 schrieb Justin B Rye: > Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Beatrice Torracca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -process, your configuration files might be lost and.... > >> +process, your configuration files might be lost and... > > > > I think it should be "might be lost and ..." (space after and) > > I tend to follow the Chicago Manual of Style, which doesn't have a > space here, but there's remarkably little agreement.
Ok. In German we would have a space there, that's why. > [...] > >> <p>The development of Debian is open to all, and new users with the right > >> skills and/or the willingness to learn are needed to maintain existing > >> packages which have been "orphaned" by their previous maintainers, to > >> -develop new packages, and to provide user support. > >> +develop new packages, to write documentation, to do translation work, to > >> +help with the Debian website, to provide user support, etc. > > > > Is it correct/good, to mention the "to" every time? Or can they be removed > > to > > improve readability? > > In this case where the first example is rather a long one the > repetition can be helpful as a way of re-establishing the grammatical > context; then once we've done it once we have to keep doing it. Ok. Then leave it as proposed by Beatrice. Holger -- Sent from my Jolla phone http://www.jolla.com/
