Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:33:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#844596: dpkg-gensymbols doesn't update arch-bits when
called with -a<arch>
has caused the Debian Bug report #844596,
regarding dpkg-gensymbols doesn't update arch-bits when called with -a<arch>
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
844596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.15
Severity: important
When dpkg-gensymbols is called with -a<arch>, it doesn't update the arch-bits
information, and keeps them set for the default architecture, even if the
default doesn't match the parameter. I didn't check for the endianness
information, but I assume it's the same.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.18.15
Hi!
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 03:32:06 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 10:57:10 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.18.15
> > Severity: important
>
> > When dpkg-gensymbols is called with -a<arch>, it doesn't update the
> > arch-bits
> > information, and keeps them set for the default architecture, even if the
> > default doesn't match the parameter. I didn't check for the endianness
> > information, but I assume it's the same.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the report. The arch-bits and
> arch-endianness are matches for specific symbols, they get matched
> against the information from the default or specified architecture,
> I'm not sure were or how you expect those values to be updated.
> Including a recipe to get there would be helpful or giving more
> detail.
Ok, closing, please reopen with additional information if this was not
a misunderstanding of how those tags work.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
