Bug#31521: dpkg: dpkg dying in eterm

[Brian Almeida]

On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>  priority. I suspect, however, that eterm does not really gratuitously
>  go around ignoring sigals like that.
Indeed not.  I just spoke with the author, Eterm doesn't touch SIGPIPE.
For info on what signals it ignores, grep SIG_IGN src/*.c