On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brian Almeida wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > priority. I suspect, however, that eterm does not really gratuitously > > go around ignoring sigals like that. > Indeed not. I just spoke with the author, Eterm doesn't touch SIGPIPE. > For info on what signals it ignores, grep SIG_IGN src/*.c
Indeed. That was an honest mistake on someone's part, attributing it to eterm. The culprit is gnome-session (and possibly some other gnome tools - I suspect, but haven't checked, panel). Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
