Your message dated Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:06:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#152269: dselect is not optional, but aptitude thinks it is
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2002 13:13:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 08 08:13:32 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.98.109] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17RYKa-0007tz-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 08:13:32 -0500
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ident=steve)
by tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17RYJo-0000VP-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:12:44 +0900
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dselect is not optional, but aptitude thinks it is
Organization: The XEmacs Project
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:12:43 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Informed Management
(RC2), i686-pc-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.56
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10
Trying to upgrade dpkg (to 1.10.2) resulted in a broken dependency
because I had removed the dselect package. I suppose this is
something in the dpkg dependencies, thus the report against dpkg.
In aptitude simply reselecting dselect resulted in a smooth upgrade.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't
have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 152269-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2002 14:06:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 08 09:06:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cabal.xs4all.nl (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([IL2b0+EGlFF93rLAniRG8t7SO2rnpiZY])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17RZ9l-0002Jx-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:06:25 -0500
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17RZ9h-0005T9-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:06:21 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:06:21 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#152269: dselect is not optional, but aptitude thinks it is
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Trying to upgrade dpkg (to 1.10.2) resulted in a broken dependency
> because I had removed the dselect package. I suppose this is
> something in the dpkg dependencies, thus the report against dpkg.
You can't remove dselect on purpose, so this is not a bug.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
