Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aiee, I sense this is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2000 06:22:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 26 00:22:32 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (kabuki.eyep.net) [203.36.158.121] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13zvCg-0001g4-00; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 00:22:31 -0600
Received: (qmail 31541 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2000 06:24:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO kabuki.eyep.net) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2000 06:24:39 -0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: various dpkg breakages
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:24:31 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.7.2-1
I'm using the dpkg from woody, and I've just done an apt-get update; apt-get
dist-upgrade, and dpkg is doing some _VERY_ weird shit. I first got a bug
installing glibc that I unfortunately can't report as I had it in my gpm
buffer, but I forgot about it and rebooted, and when I just re-ran apt-get
dist-upgrade, it worked, it was something about an internal error, was
really weird. IIRC it was from dump.c, line 160.
Here's one I _CAN_ log:
Preparing to replace calife 2.8.4-2 (using .../calife_2.8.4b-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement calife ...
dpkg: /home/wichert/sources/cvs/debian/x/dpkg-1.7.2/lib/dump.c:180:
w_dependency: Assertion `yp->up == pigp' failed.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly
This happens every time.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79807-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2003 06:35:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 12 00:35:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJobb-0003Fa-00; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:35:55 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F2B3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:51 +1100 (EST)
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (epistula [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 03687-02-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: from roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au
[203.28.240.3])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC2A5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: by roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 1280)
id 0C08117E3C; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:53 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aiee, I sense this is not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at trinity.unimelb.edu.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looking back at the bug log for #79807, I doubt xfonts-base was making
my / ro, somehow.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org>
Debian X Strike Force: http://people.debian.org/~branden=
/xsf/
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/sdTIcPClnTztfv0RAv8uAKCO/25vlH0tS6OZoL8kk4OKeaMg6QCfUVu3
h51Z+SPowWXwgRWQYoHH5wg=
=/SGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/--
